Who Should Stay and Who Should Go?

by

IT organizations, along with the rest of their businesses, will continue to face pressure to cut staff. This raises a tough question: who should stay and who should go? Most people would agree that even cuts across the board, while seemingly fairer, are likely not the optimal solution to the problem. The most recent issue of CIO Magazine has an article making “The Case for Enterprise Architects”. Ms. Nash is on target, albeit focused in on one role or group within the organization. The Enterprise Architect (EA) role is a particularly interesting one to consider, since it can be difficult to justify and relatively easy to get by without in the very short term.

Ms. Nash does a good job explaining what an EA does and why the role is more important than ever, so I won’t rehash it. Skeptical readers can go read the article. Basically, EAs are the critical link between business and IT, a link that is imperative during a time when making the right decisions about technology is more critical than ever. So generally, I agree that leadership should carefully consider the implications before pink-slipping an EA. That comes with a huge caveat. While the good EAs are arguably the most critical resources in the IT organization, in practice, I come across few good EAs. Many architects give the role a bad name: those who are really developers on steroids who needed a better title to get into a higher pay grade, those who are so removed from reality up in their ivory tower that they don’t even know how to deliver projects anymore, and those whose egos have grown so large that they must use their technology knowledge to scare superiors and subordinates into getting whatever they want. We’ve all met those types and they need to go. First.

But, if we go with the assumption that an IT organization has a quality Enterprise Architecture group, Ms. Nash makes a great case for the EAs, but doesn’t address who should get the pink slips. It is hard to swallow, but most IT organizations have fat to trim and can look at this as an opportunity to critically assess the value they are bringing to their business. I recommend stepping through the different types of value provided by an IT organization and considering the necessity of each resource associated.

  1. Start with basic needs. Who is required to keep the business up and running at the service levels absolutely required? The second part of the question is key: what levels are absolutely required? With cost cuts, the internal business customers may no longer enjoy 24×7 support or speedy resolution to non-critical requests. These resources should be cut to the point of being a little uncomfortable. And it may make sense to consider outsourcing more if these utility needs are still internal to the IT organization.
  2. Next, look at the critical projects that must be delivered. Apologies to all my developer friends, but application development or project delivery is often the area that can afford the biggest cuts. Start by going through the project list with the business sponsors and determining what must be done in the next year. Then review the resources required and cut the rest. In the long term, this is generally the easiest skill-set to ramp up quickly through hiring or bringing in external resources. Long term, this can be a great opportunity to improve the talent pool.
  3. Then, review the resources that do architecture and planning, including the EAs. Make sure to retain those who can help make tough decisions around technology and help implement technology more cost effectively for the short and long term. If those people do not exist, the role may need to be hired.
  4. Finally, review the people who support the organization and assess whether their role is adding value in the short term. Sometimes these roles can be eliminated, combined or outsourced.

Layoffs are always hard, but if the decisions are made with consideration to short and long term needs, the organization will absorb the change easier and move forward stronger than before.

READ MORE

The Magic of Mortals

The Magic of Mortals

Daily we wake up to new developments in automation, Artificial Intelligence (AI), and Machine Learning (ML). Across sectors and industries, automated solutions prove highly successful in surpassing the capacity of the human brain for certain tasks, improving...

read more
Leveling Up: How to Hone Your Skills at Home

Leveling Up: How to Hone Your Skills at Home

Leaders have been trying to crack the code on talent development for years. Recent studies have shown, however, that strength-focused leadership [read: intentionally elevating the qualities that already come naturally to us] is the clear winner for developing talent...

read more
Fake Case Study: Jack of all trades vs. Master of One

Fake Case Study: Jack of all trades vs. Master of One

  Listen to any earnings call or executive presentation and you will likely hear the terms “top line” and “bottom line.” These are words used to describe a business’s performance. According to Investopedia, the words are defined as follows: Top line refers to the...

read more
Your Personality Is Showing

Your Personality Is Showing

There I was, minding my own business one evening, digging into my organization's SEO performance (as one does), when I came across something interesting. Search terms related to "MBTI" — or the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, developed by Katherine Cook Briggs and Isabel...

read more
Lessons From a Change Manager Who Hates Change

Lessons From a Change Manager Who Hates Change

Hello. My name is Monique, and I’m a change manager who hates change.   After years of receiving “consulting therapy” from various mentors, I am now able to say these words out loud and proudly. But for a long time, it felt more like an admission of guilt. I mean, who...

read more
Creativity as a Cure

Creativity as a Cure

The topic of creative solutioning has been front and center these days as we talk more and more about organizational adaptability in the face of dynamic and uncertain times. For example, I recently read about a project that got me thinking about specific priorities...

read more
Thought Ensemble, a Pariveda Company — Why Now?

Thought Ensemble, a Pariveda Company — Why Now?

Big news over here as we close out the year - we have been acquired by Pariveda, a 750-person consulting firm in 12 markets across North America! We are now “Thought Ensemble, a Pariveda Company” and I’ll be serving as the Managing Vice President continuing to lead...

read more
Thought Ensemble Joins Pariveda Solutions!

Thought Ensemble Joins Pariveda Solutions!

Dallas, December 9, 2021 /PRNewswire/ -- Pariveda, a leader specializing in solving complex technology and business problems, announces the acquisition of Thought Ensemble. With the addition of Thought Ensemble, Pariveda now provides holistic business strategy,...

read more
Thoughts on Colorado’s Equal Pay for Equal Work Act

Thoughts on Colorado’s Equal Pay for Equal Work Act

It was about a year ago that we first started hearing about Colorado’s Equal Pay for Equal Work Act (SB19-085) and I knew it was going to be national news. We’d just gotten past the “Rocky Mountain High” jokes, and our lovely state was trying to break new ground...

read more