Can “technical debt” be measured at the portfolio level?

by

The concept of technical debt has popped up recently with a couple of our clients. Specifically, these clients are interested in how to measure it across their application or product portfolio. It came up most recently as we were brainstorming the measures for a scorecard for a large technology group that wanted to track their progress towards increasing speed and decreasing costs through strategic architecture consolidation.

Note: the term has been used as a metaphor for a while in the software development world, but more commonly during the software development lifecycle. Apparently Ward Cunningham coined this term originally to describe when a development team “chooses a design or construction approach that’s expedient in the short term but that increases complexity and is more costly in the long term.” Here’s a writeup by Steve McConnell that is dated but very comprehensive if you want the full background.

But back up to the portfolio level … assume we define technical debt as maintenance costs for a product/ technology that could be avoided by making a certain investment. Of course not all technical debt is bad. There are very good reasons to incur debt especially when you can make a case that it accelerates innovation or addresses customer needs. But many times debt is incurred needlessly due to ignorance or poor decision making. Clearly if we had decisions to make all over again, we probably wouldn’t end up with the same unique blend of technologies, tools and methods underlying our portfolio. Did we really need that one-off DBMS license? Do we still want to support and enhance applications written in FoxPro? Why can’t we resist trying a new source code control tool on every project? These questions come up, but often too late to do anything about them.

So the question is, could we measure something early on in the project lifecycle, as we are making decisions about the technologies, tools and methods to be used, that tracks the technical debt we are incurring from veering off a defined path?

We talked about it extensively with our clients and in both cases came to the conclusion that a lagging indicator like maintenance spend, combined with more of a leading indicator like compliance to architectural standards, were the most direct ways to measure it. It seems the concept is a very useful metaphor for helping business executives understand the implications of technology decisions, but measuring it directly seems to be impractical.

But I would love to hear from those of you who may have some ideas or even better, some history, with measuring it effectively!

READ MORE

The Magic of Mortals

The Magic of Mortals

Daily we wake up to new developments in automation, Artificial Intelligence (AI), and Machine Learning (ML). Across sectors and industries, automated solutions prove highly successful in surpassing the capacity of the human brain for certain tasks, improving...

read more
Leveling Up: How to Hone Your Skills at Home

Leveling Up: How to Hone Your Skills at Home

Leaders have been trying to crack the code on talent development for years. Recent studies have shown, however, that strength-focused leadership [read: intentionally elevating the qualities that already come naturally to us] is the clear winner for developing talent...

read more
Fake Case Study: Jack of all trades vs. Master of One

Fake Case Study: Jack of all trades vs. Master of One

  Listen to any earnings call or executive presentation and you will likely hear the terms “top line” and “bottom line.” These are words used to describe a business’s performance. According to Investopedia, the words are defined as follows: Top line refers to the...

read more
Your Personality Is Showing

Your Personality Is Showing

There I was, minding my own business one evening, digging into my organization's SEO performance (as one does), when I came across something interesting. Search terms related to "MBTI" — or the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, developed by Katherine Cook Briggs and Isabel...

read more
Lessons From a Change Manager Who Hates Change

Lessons From a Change Manager Who Hates Change

Hello. My name is Monique, and I’m a change manager who hates change.   After years of receiving “consulting therapy” from various mentors, I am now able to say these words out loud and proudly. But for a long time, it felt more like an admission of guilt. I mean, who...

read more
Creativity as a Cure

Creativity as a Cure

The topic of creative solutioning has been front and center these days as we talk more and more about organizational adaptability in the face of dynamic and uncertain times. For example, I recently read about a project that got me thinking about specific priorities...

read more
Thought Ensemble, a Pariveda Company — Why Now?

Thought Ensemble, a Pariveda Company — Why Now?

Big news over here as we close out the year - we have been acquired by Pariveda, a 750-person consulting firm in 12 markets across North America! We are now “Thought Ensemble, a Pariveda Company” and I’ll be serving as the Managing Vice President continuing to lead...

read more
Thought Ensemble Joins Pariveda Solutions!

Thought Ensemble Joins Pariveda Solutions!

Dallas, December 9, 2021 /PRNewswire/ -- Pariveda, a leader specializing in solving complex technology and business problems, announces the acquisition of Thought Ensemble. With the addition of Thought Ensemble, Pariveda now provides holistic business strategy,...

read more
Thoughts on Colorado’s Equal Pay for Equal Work Act

Thoughts on Colorado’s Equal Pay for Equal Work Act

It was about a year ago that we first started hearing about Colorado’s Equal Pay for Equal Work Act (SB19-085) and I knew it was going to be national news. We’d just gotten past the “Rocky Mountain High” jokes, and our lovely state was trying to break new ground...

read more