Can “technical debt” be measured at the portfolio level?

by

The concept of technical debt has popped up recently with a couple of our clients. Specifically, these clients are interested in how to measure it across their application or product portfolio. It came up most recently as we were brainstorming the measures for a scorecard for a large technology group that wanted to track their progress towards increasing speed and decreasing costs through strategic architecture consolidation.

Note: the term has been used as a metaphor for a while in the software development world, but more commonly during the software development lifecycle. Apparently Ward Cunningham coined this term originally to describe when a development team “chooses a design or construction approach that’s expedient in the short term but that increases complexity and is more costly in the long term.” Here’s a writeup by Steve McConnell that is dated but very comprehensive if you want the full background.

But back up to the portfolio level … assume we define technical debt as maintenance costs for a product/ technology that could be avoided by making a certain investment. Of course not all technical debt is bad. There are very good reasons to incur debt especially when you can make a case that it accelerates innovation or addresses customer needs. But many times debt is incurred needlessly due to ignorance or poor decision making. Clearly if we had decisions to make all over again, we probably wouldn’t end up with the same unique blend of technologies, tools and methods underlying our portfolio. Did we really need that one-off DBMS license? Do we still want to support and enhance applications written in FoxPro? Why can’t we resist trying a new source code control tool on every project? These questions come up, but often too late to do anything about them.

So the question is, could we measure something early on in the project lifecycle, as we are making decisions about the technologies, tools and methods to be used, that tracks the technical debt we are incurring from veering off a defined path?

We talked about it extensively with our clients and in both cases came to the conclusion that a lagging indicator like maintenance spend, combined with more of a leading indicator like compliance to architectural standards, were the most direct ways to measure it. It seems the concept is a very useful metaphor for helping business executives understand the implications of technology decisions, but measuring it directly seems to be impractical.

But I would love to hear from those of you who may have some ideas or even better, some history, with measuring it effectively!

READ MORE

Calling Everyone Back to the DEI Table

Calling Everyone Back to the DEI Table

It is no secret that 2020 put a glaring spotlight on the importance of diversity, equity, and inclusion in our everyday lives. As our communities reckoned with difficult questions and conversations around racial equity and justice, those topics found their way into...

read more
Did We Just Fall in Love With Hybrid Meetings?

Did We Just Fall in Love With Hybrid Meetings?

Last week, we held a two-day training session for our extended leadership team. We’d been planning it for months — the meeting room, the dinner activity, the team building exercises … the works! This was, as I’m sure you’re picking up on, more than just a meeting,...

read more
“The Great Resignation” Has a Really Good Publicist

“The Great Resignation” Has a Really Good Publicist

Mass resignations are a big deal right now. Yes. Is it surprising? Absolutely not. People leaving for greener pastures is not a new concept. How many of you — given a choice between two situations — would choose the one that LEAST benefited you? If a better option...

read more
The Human Quotient: Heuristics and Bias in Analytics

The Human Quotient: Heuristics and Bias in Analytics

As individuals, we all have a unique set of heuristics and biases that show up in our daily lives, whether we notice them or not. This means that for a lot of the decisions we make, whether personal or professional, there is an underlying, subconscious process that...

read more
Why Keeping It Real Is a Winning Strategy

Why Keeping It Real Is a Winning Strategy

If I had to sum up my pandemic year, I might say it was the year I got to spend each day of an entire summer with my daughter. It was also the year that I significantly altered my career path by taking the brilliant advice of my coach: to lead with my values (keep it...

read more
Meaningful Brand Maturity vs. Promotional Box Checking

Meaningful Brand Maturity vs. Promotional Box Checking

Featuring: Errika Flood-Moultrie Diversity. Equity. Inclusion (DEI). Individually, each word packs its own unique punch, but together, this lineup represents something much greater — profound even — and that is true head and heart transformation. As a people-first,...

read more